Qing · Ministry Secretary

Ende 恩德

Attested AD 1824 - AD 1824

Passages: 2
Chapters: 2
Histories: 1

Overview

Ende was a Ministry Secretary.

Life and dates

Attested activity

AD 1824 道光四年
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 111, passage 86
AD 1824 道光四年
Dated from the passage context · Draft History of Qing 352, passages 149, 156

Key source chapters

Draft History of Qing, Chapter 111 Volume 111 Treatises 86: Selection and Examinations 6, Kao Ji 1 passage
Draft History of Qing, Chapter 352 Volume 352 Biographies 139: Jiang Cheng, Jin Guangti, Zu Zhiwang, Han Feng 1 passage

Career and standing

Ministry of Justice clerk 刑部司員
Held
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 111, passage 86
ministry secretary 司員
Held
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 352, passage 156
Implicated
Bribery
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 352, passage 156

Places and affiliations

Polity Qing 清 · Relation Served
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 111, passage 86

Events and relationships

Deceived chiefs for first grade nomination
Legal · Conspirator
Directly stated · Draft History of Qing 111, passage 86
Relation Associate of · Person Hou Jiqing (候際清)
Strongly inferred · Draft History of Qing 111, passage 86

References in the histories

Draft History of Qing, Chapter 111Volume 111 Treatises 86: Selection and Examinations 6, Kao Ji · 1 passage

道光四年，候際清贖罪舞弊一案，刑部司員恩德等朋謀撞騙堂官，以謬登薦牘，保列一等，下部議處。 In Daoguang 4 (1824), in the Hou Jiqing bribery case, Ministry of Justice clerks including Ende conspired to deceive their chiefs into recommending unworthy officials for first grade; the case was referred for disciplinary action.

Draft History of Qing, Chapter 352Volume 352 Biographies 139: Jiang Cheng, Jin Guangti, Zu Zhiwang, Han Feng · 1 passage

詔斥含混取巧，命大學士托津等查訊，侍郎恩銘、常英、司員恩德等皆有賄囑情事，崶亦解任就質，坐失察司員得賄，嗣子知情，親屬撞騙，議奪職遣戍，因年老，從寬，命效力萬年吉地工程處。 The throne denounced this as evasive trickery and ordered Grand Secretary Tuojin to investigate. Vice Ministers Enming and Chang Ying and Secretary En De were all implicated in bribery. Feng was removed to give testimony, punished for failing to detect a secretary's bribes, his son's knowledge of them, and relatives' fraud, and recommended for dismissal and exile. Because of his age he was spared and sent to serve at the imperial mausoleum construction office.